Message Forum


 
go to bottom 
  Post Message
  
    Prior Page
 Page  
Next Page      

02/27/19 05:16 PM #901    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

AOC spoke like a Congresswoman today.

Chairman Cummings spoke like an American hero.  

 

Character does matter -

                       especially in presidents.

 


02/28/19 08:52 AM #902    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

It's baseball’s pre-season - and Trump struck out.

His personal lawyer of 10 years called him a crook.

Kim Jong Un pulled the plug on his peace prize.

His vaunted economy slowed to 2.6% growth in the 4th quarter of 2018.

To top it all off - Israel's attorney general could soon indict Netanyahu for bribery and corruption.  Netanyahu is entitled to a final hearing before he’s formally charged.

All part of a terrible, horrible, no good, very bad day for the Donald.

(Nothing in Michael Cohen's testimony surprised Republican Congressmen -

they did not refute his testimony about Donald Trump;

they pummeled Cohen’s credibility and worried he might get a book deal.

 


02/28/19 09:21 AM #903    

 

Alan A. Alop

Gloomy thought for the day:

America, despite its magnificent Constitution and lofty ideals, has always been but three steps from fascistic dictatorship. Donald Trump is the first step.         A. Alop


02/28/19 11:42 PM #904    

Stewart Myrent

​Alan, one thing, before we slip into March (although I am very fearful of the answer), if Trump is the first step towards a fascistic dicatatorship, what are the other two steps?


03/01/19 10:40 AM #905    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

Walking & chewing gum at the same time -

Democrats are not afraid of gun control anymore.  Two days in a row the House passed common gun sense legislation...  

On Wednesday, with some bipartisan support, the House passed the most significant bill to come out of the chamber in more than 20 years - a bill that would require background checks on all firearm sales.

On Thursday, the House passed the “Charleston loophole” bill which would prevent some firearms from being transferred by licensed gun dealers before the required background checks have been completed.  

The convergence of Democrats around the universal background check partly derives from the overwhelming public backing for the measure which usually exceeds 80% support in polls.  Forty Democrats were elected to replace Republicans and almost every one of them made gun safety an issue in their campaign.  The key to the shifting politics of guns is that Democrats from suburban seats in all parts of the country -- even the South -- are generally supporting tougher restrictions.  We should expect to see consistent and sustained legislating on gun safety.

Any gun safety measure the House approves still faces very long odds in the Senate which is controlled by a Republican majority rooted in rural states.  Never-the-less it is reasonable to anticipate more Republicans will cross over to support background checks than Democrats will defect to oppose it.  It is likely that House Democrats will continue to debate and pass gun legislation over the next two years.  Democrats promise a debate on weapons of war and whether they belong in our communities... legislation has been introduced to regulate assault weapons under the National Firearms Act which bans fully automatic weapons.  

 

with attribution to Ronald Brownstein, Why Democrats are not afraid of gun control anymore  

 

 


03/02/19 10:45 AM #906    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

A campaign founded on birtherism was based on racism.   

Trump asked Cohen if he could name a country run by a black person that wasn’t a “s***hole” when Barack Obama was President of the United States.

We cannot claim we’re not racists because the woman who cleans our house is a black woman.

 


03/02/19 02:31 PM #907    

 

David A. Bantz

1. If Trump's demagogery, authoritarian governance, and cult following are collectively a big step toward fascist tyranny, other steps, based on the history of 20th Century fascism and communism, are clearly and congently described by distinguished historian Timothy Snyder in On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century.

Next steps include:

2. Demonization of an "other" and fear mongering - identifying any and all problems with a group defined as foreign, evil, sub-human, and devious. Nazi's pointed primarily to Jews; Trumpists primarily to darker-skinned immigrants and asylum-seekers; both foment resentment of reason and homosexuality. ("Mexico is sending us rapists and murders who will take away your job." "Donad J Trump is calling for an immediate end to all immigration from Muslim countries." "Every country governed by blacks is a shit-hole country.")

3. Seeking to undermine and de-legitimize institutions, including the press, independent judiciary, Universities, and elections. ("The press is the enemy of the people." "A judge with Mexican ancestry cannot be fair."  "Trump lost the popular vote by 3 million only because of massive and pervasive vote fraud by Democrats.")

4. Encouraging violent suppression of opposing voices. (calls in rallies to rough up demonstrators, Neo-nazis chanting Nazi racist slogans are "very fine people," a policy of long-term separation of young children from parents legally requesting asylum - this latter defined in international law as genocide)

Take heart though! Read Snyder's lessions from the disastrous history of European tyranny and his concrete and practical steps to resist the imposition of tyranny in the U.S.


03/04/19 10:28 PM #908    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

The House Judiciary List of Trump’s friends and associates: “A Who’s Who of Ne’er-Do-Wells” -- Frank Figliuzzi 


03/05/19 12:21 PM #909    

 

Alan A. Alop

Fake news item #3754.

Fox News to change its name to “Pravda (Truth).”

Sean Hannity today announced that the Fox News Corporation would immediately change its name to “Pravda.”  Hannity stated “Freedom of speech is overrated.  It is truth in speech that matters.   All news organs should align themselves to the policies of the freedom-loving Administration. Adverse news items must be suppressed as antagonistic to American values.  News organizations that participate in witch-hunts and fake news should be attacked and marginalized as Enemies of the People. Attempts to portray the President as a moronic liar must be negated as anti-American.  This is not a President who would wrap himself in the American flag and say anything off the top of his coiffed head.  The President is a patriot (and stable genius) who respects our true allies such as Vladimir Putin and Kim Song Un. If the 2020 election is rigged like the 2018 races, American patriots must resist any attempt to replace or de-legitimize our Beloved Leader."


03/05/19 02:16 PM #910    

Stewart Myrent

​David, I would be very interested in reading Timothy Snyder's "On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century".  It sounds fascinating to me, however, I am getting bogged down in Doris K. Goodwin's "The Bully Pulpit".  The only other book of hers, that I've read, is "Team of Rivals", about Lincoln's Cabinet.  I don't remember it taking me that long to get through, because I'm about halfway through "Bully Pulpit", and it's been months since I started it.  Janis, I loved the quote from Frank Figliuzzi, and Alan, are you trying to scare me?  If so, it's working.


03/05/19 02:46 PM #911    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

Michael Gerson: “Our president lacks dignity.

“This might sound like a relatively small matter compared with things like honesty, equality, and justice.  But dignity — both acting in a dignified manner and treating others in a manner appropriate to their dignity — is a core value of democracy.

“America’s founders were generally suspicious of absolute democracy, which can easily become tyranny exercised by 50% of the public plus one.  

“In a strong democracy, those in the majority are restrained by respect for the dignity of those in the minority.  

“If the majority uses its (temporary) power to demean, humiliate, and dishonor those out of power, it plants seeds of future revenge and escalation.  Disagreements become feuds, and the sense of being in a shared enterprise and having a shared fate is weakened.  

“A democracy is designed for disagreement; it is undermined by mutual contempt.

“And Trump’s whole style of politics is the cultivation of contempt.  

“This directly weakens our unity as a nation.  

“The first president, George Washington, made dignity the defining commitment of his political life.  He felt that the office of president should have an element of nearly royal elevation.  But the generation of Washington gave way to the age of Jackson and a much earthier version of democratic participation.  Presidents have tended to fall into either the Washington or Jackson camp.  

“Trump is not merely Jacksonian in his crudeness he has made the denial of dignity to certain people and groups a political rallying cry.  This kind of cruelty and dehumanization is the defining commitment of his political life.  He is not merely undignified as a leader; he is committed to stripping off the dignity possessed by others.  There is a tie between incivility and injustice.  

“When a president uses his office to demean others, he is undermining an essential democratic premise — that those out of power are still protected from abuse by general respect for their inherent worth and dignity.  They are still partners in a common enterprise.  And they deserve better than cruelty and contempt.”    

 

from TRUMP IS UNDERMINING DEMOCRACY by Michael Gerson in response to Trump’s CPAC speech last Saturday — “two hours of Trump unplugged, unleashed, uncensored, unreconstructed, and unhinged — a vivid reminder that Trump is most comfortable and authentic when he is a rude, arrogant crank yelling profanities at Correction: through the television ... a bold assertion that Trump has learned nothing — absolutely nothing — during his first two years in office.  Not manners. Not economics. Not geopolitics. Not simple decency ... Trump’s speech combined demagoguery and bigotry in equal measure.”  

 

BEWARE: Trump wants his supporters fired up and ready to go with their new rallying cry - “Bulls**t” -  when Mueller’s report and Congressional hearings start unfolding Trump’s malfeasance in public view. 

 

 


03/07/19 10:08 AM #912    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

Stewart,

today is your day...

Happy Birthday!

All best wishes today and always.  

May you continue to be an avid reader (of books)

and prolific poster on the Forum.  

There will be lots of noise this election cycle -  

look forward to all you share.

for you on your birthday...

I guess Trump is now a war hero since he was shot down in Hanoi.

 

 


03/07/19 03:30 PM #913    

Stewart Myrent

​Janis, thank you so much for the b'day wishes.  I'm leaving for work in less than an hour.  I just turned 72, so I am now as old as all you other old f***s.  Suddenly, 80 doesn't seem so far off anymore.  (Because I am old enough to know how quickly the decades elapse.)   Before I turned 70, I remember wondering when I was 20 or 25, did I ever picture myself as a 70 year old man.  I don't ever remember doing that, but my guess was, that I would have pictured myself as a curled-up, shrunken old man.  I seem to remember when we were kids, people in their 70's were considered to be really old.  Thankfully, I am not shrunken or curled up, just old.  Having a good b'day; met my ex-wife & daughter for breakfast.  Talk to you soon.  Also, Janis, liked the remark about Trump being shot down in Hanoi, although I'm pretty sure he'll NEVER be a war hero.


03/08/19 07:47 AM #914    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

Today is International Women’s Day.

Last night was a flagrant display of white male privilege -

“aside from bank and tax fraud,” the judge said, “he (Manafort) lived an otherwise blameless life.”  

Sometimes crime happens in the courtroom.  

Who can deny the pernicious discrimination in our country?

  


03/09/19 12:21 PM #915    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

Happy Birthday, Donald Schwartz.

The following article encourages me to hope you'll post your take on all that's happening.

Sadly your contributions to the Forum were (without notice) among the 4,000 deleted posts...

Stewart Myrent did not realize how briefly he would be as old as many of us...

This is your day - Enjoy!

 

Trump Just Might Have Won the 2020 Election Today

The president's speech at CPAC was a bedazzling mix of bravado, B.S., humor, and positive vision no Democrat will be able to top.

Nick Gillespie

Mar. 2, 2019 3:25 pm

It's way too early to be thinking this, much less saying it, but what the hell: If Donald Trump is able to deliver the sort of performance he gave today at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), the annual meeting of right-wingers held near Washington, D.C., his reelection is a foregone conclusion.

There is simply no potential candidate in the Democratic Party who wouldn't be absolutely blown off the stage by him. I say this as someone who is neither a Trump fanboy nor a Never Trumper. But he was not simply good, he was Prince-at-the-Super-Bowl great, deftly flinging juvenile taunts at everyone who has ever crossed him, tossing red meat to the Republican faithful, and going sotto voce serious to talk about justice being done for working-class Americans screwed over by global corporations.

In a heavily improvised speech that lasted over two hours, the 72-year-old former (future?) reality TV star hit every greatest hit in his repertoire ("Crooked Hillary," "build the wall," "America is winning again," and more all made appearances) while riffing on everything from the Green New Deal to his own advanced age and weird hair to the wisdom of soldiers over generals. At times, it was like listening to Robin Williams' genie in the Disney movie Aladdin, Howard Stern in his peak years as a radio shock jock, or Don Rickles as an insult comic. When he started making asides, Trump observed, "This is how I got elected, by going off script." Two years into his presidency and he's just getting warmed up.

First and foremost, Trump was frequently funny and outre in the casually mean way that New Yorkers exude like nobody else in America. "You put the wrong people in a couple of positions," he said, lamenting the appointment of Robert Mueller as a special prosecutor, "and all of a sudden they're trying to take you out with bullshit." He voiced Jeff Sessions in a mock-Southern accent, recusing "muhself" and asked the adoring crowd why the former attorney generally hadn't told him he was going to do that before he was appointed.

Democrats backing the Green New Deal (GND) "are talking about trains to Hawaii," he said. "They haven't figured out how to get to Europe yet." He begged the Democrats not to abandon the GND because he recognizes that the more its details and costs are discussed, the more absurd it will become. "When the wind stops blowing, that's the end of your energy," he said at one point. "Did the wind stop blowing, I'd like to watch television today, guys?" "We'll go back to boats," he said, drawing huge laughs when he added, "I don't want to talk [the Democrats] out of [the GND], I just want to be the Republican who runs against it."

He railed against Never-Trump Republicans: "They're on mouth-to-mouth resuscitation," he said, adding "they're basically dishonest people" that no one cares about. He joked about being in the White House all alone on New Year's because of the government shutdown. "I was in the White House and I was lonely, so I went to Iraq," he said, recounting that when his plane was approaching the U.S. airstrip in Iraq, all lights had to be extinguished for landing. "We spend trillions of dollars in the Middle East and we can't land planes [in Iraq] with the lights on," he said, shaking his head in disbelief. "We gotta get out." He then riffed on the generals he met there who, contrary to the Pentagon brass he dealt with, said they could vanquish ISIS in a week. He claimed to have talked with a general named "Raising Cane," which might be Brigadier Gen. J. Daniel Caine, but Trump is the farthest thing from a details guy, right? "Sometimes I learn more from soldiers than I do generals," he said, deftly moving from jokes to more-substantive discussions of policies or issues.

You can cover a huge amount of material in two-hours-plus, and Trump certainly did that. After speaking sympathetically of immigrants who want to come to the United States and saying that we need more people because the economy (well, his economy, as he takes credit for it) is doing so well, he immediately dismissed the Guatemalans, Salvadorans, and Hondurans traveling north in caravans across Mexico. In a bizarre display of simultaneous empathy and contempt, he talked at length about how female migrants are being systematically "raped" but also how the caravans were filled with criminals and drug dealers. It was "sad to see how stupid we've become" to think that the caravans are filled with good people. As he has been doing since his State of the Union address, he has been laying out a partial, inchoate case for a skills-based immigration program. He explained walking away from the table with North Korea even as he noted yet again that he has a great relationship with the dictator Kim Jong Un. In a long riff on trade policy, he invoked the "Great Tariff Debate of 1888" and how China "and everyone else" had been taking advantage of us until he started pushing back. He took time to talk about how no, really, the crowd at his inauguration was in fact historically large despite all publicly available evidence.

All in all, it was, in the words of Daniel Dale, the Washington correspondent for the Toronto Star, "one of the least-hinged speeches Trump has given in a long time." It was indeed all over the place but like the weirdly wide-ranging and digressive speech in which he declared a national emergency, it was also an absolute tour de force, laying out every major point of disagreement between Republicans and Democrats (abortion, the Second Amendment, and taxes, among other things) while tagging the latter aggressively as socialists who will not only end the private provision of health care but take over the energy sector too. Those charges take on new life in the wake of the announcement of the GND and comments, however short-lived, by Democrats such as Kamala Harris, who at one point recently called for an end to private health care. And over 100 House Democrats have signed on to a plan that would end private health insurance in two years. For all the biting criticism and dark humor in today's speech, Trump has mostly ditched the "American Carnage" rhetoric that marked his first Inaugural Address, pushing onto liberals and Democrats all the negativity and anger that used to surround him like the dust cloud surrounds Pigpen in the old Peanuts cartoons. "We have people in Congress right now who hate our country," he said. "We can name every one of them. Sad, very, very sad."

At moments, he seemed to be workshopping his themes and slogans for 2020. "We believe in the American Dream, not the socialist nightmare," he averred at one point. "Now you have a president who finally standing up for America." The future, he said "does not belong to those who believe in socialism. The future belongs to those who believe in freedom. I've said it before and will say it again: America will never be a socialist country." That's a line that may not work forever, but it will almost certainly get the job done in 2020.

None of this is to suggest that this speech wasn't as fact-challenged as almost every utterance Trump has given since announcing his candidacy for the Republican nomination (go to Daniel Dale's Twitter thread for a running count of misstatements of fact). He hammered trade deficits in a way that will remind anyone with an undergrad economics course under their belt that he fundamentally doesn't know what he's talking about. He misrepresented both NAFTA and the new trade bill he crafted with Mexico and Canada, and at the exact moment that hundreds of wearied listeners started leaving the ballroom at The Gaylord Resort and Convention Center, he claimed that not a single person had left their seat.

But the 2020 presidential race is not going to be decided based on which candidate is more tightly moored to reality. It's going to be decided, like these things always are, by the relative health of the economy and the large vision of the future the different candidates put forward. As the economy continues to expand (however anemically compared to historical averages) and he continues to avoid credible charges of impeachable offenses, Trump is becoming sunnier and sunnier while the Democrats are painting contemporary America as a late-capitalist hellhole riven by growing racial, ethnic, and other tensions.

Trump isn't the creator of post-factual politics in America, he is merely currently its most-gifted practitioner (oddly, his ideological and demographic counterpart and fellow New Yorker Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez may become a challenger to him on precisely this score). Trump may have next to no credibility in profoundly disturbing ways, but American politics has been drifting away from reality for the entire 21st century, when the 2000 election was essentially decided by a coin flip, the United States entered the Iraq War under false premises, and Barack Obama took home Politifact's 2013 "Lie of the Year" award and dissembled unconvincingly in the wake of Edward Snowden's revelations.

That Trump didn't invent the current situation doesn't mean we shouldn't be concerned about it, but if he can continue to perform the way he did today at CPAC, it remains to be seen what Democratic rival can rise to that challenge.

 

 


03/10/19 09:17 AM #916    

 

Larry Metnick

Yesterday I was at Niles West. They were hosting a big regional boys gymnastics meet that was named in honor of Coach John Burkel. I had received an email that he would be coming in from his home in South Carolina to be there. I was able to “catch up” with him. We still had the same relationship as student athlete and coach who motivates and takes pride in the accomplishments of his “kids”.


03/11/19 11:56 AM #917    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

       

 


03/11/19 05:01 PM #918    

Stewart Myrent

​Larry, I Iiked your story of going back to Niles West, to see coach Burkel.  I remember him, although I was not on the gymnastics team (presumably, you were).  I remember him as being marginally older than we students.  At the time, I would have guessed that he was 7-8 yrs. older than we (around mid-20's).  So, when you mentioned that you, "still had the same relationship...", I thought it was a little odd, as coach Burkel, if not in his 80's already, has got to be knocking on the door.  I am guessing,  though, that he's probably in really great shape (for an 80-yr. old man).  Janis, I loved the Dr. Seuss song (newly discovered).  That Dr. Seuss really hits it on the head every time.  I'm so happy to find the good doctor is still teaching us valuable lessons & in such a rhymy way.  I love that guy!  (I'm pretty sure he started me on my road to discovery, through reading.) 


03/12/19 09:12 PM #919    

Stewart Myrent

​I wanted to add that my favorite Dr. Seuss book was "Horton Hatches the Egg", which was the first of the Dr. Seuss books that we've come to know & love, and was published in 1940 - way before any of us were born.  It preceded "Horton Hears a Who!", and the Whos & Whoville & later the Grinch, by fourteen years.  Horton, who famously said, "I meant what I said, and I said what I meant.  An elephant's faithful, one hundred percent!", taught us all an important lesson, about the value of keeping one's word, even to the unscrupulous & lazy bird, Mayzie.  Love that guy!  Even compared to the Cat in the Hat & Yertle the Turtle & others, Horton was the tops!


03/13/19 12:33 PM #920    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

I too agree with Nancy Pelosi about continuing rigorous oversight and waiting for irrefutable evidence and bipartisan support before moving on to impeachment.

Democrats have serious legislative work to focus on.

Paul Ryan was done in by Trump and Mitch McConnell could be on his way out too.

Of utmost importance is to restore our government to a fact based democracy and rid ourselves of Trump’s authoritarian regime. 

 


03/13/19 01:11 PM #921    

 

Alan A. Alop

Samuel L. Jackson has sent a scathing message to people who aren’t speaking out against President Donald Trump.

In a new interview with Esquire magazine, the “Captain Marvel” star said it was “not fucking okay” that “this motherfucker is like ruining the planet and all kinds of other crazy shit.”

“And if you’re not saying anything, then you’re complicit,” he added.


03/13/19 02:52 PM #922    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

An abdication of leadership in air safety -

that’s why Ethiopian Airlines will send the black boxes to European air-safety experts for data analysis -

U.S. authorities aren’t trusted to determine the cause of the disaster after ruling that the model is safe to fly.

Are we leading from behind?

America last (not first) to ground Boeing 737 MAX 8s and MAX 9s.

Not until the planes were allowed only within and over American airspace did the FAA (forget Boeing) ground the planes...

How much did Boeing contribute to Trump’s Inaugural?

Flight attendants asked, "Where's our integrity?  our concern for life?"

346 lives lost in crashes in Indonesia and Ethiopia of two brand new Boeing 737 MAX 8s;

correcting new control software delayed because of the 5 week government shutdown.

 


03/14/19 06:44 PM #923    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

Like the first shoots of grass in the spring twelve Republican Senators emerged and blocked Trump’s emergency declaration (they read Article I and affirmed the separation of powers).  

The resolution will now go to Trump who is expected to use his first veto against it.

 

Why is there product liability for every product but guns?

The Connecticut Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling today - the Court ruled Sandy Hook parents can sue gun maker Remington for the way they marketed the AR-15 that killed their children.  

 

If you read Breitbart’s Trump interview you too are no doubt missing Horton (Dr. Seuss’ one hundred percent faithful Elephant).

 


03/15/19 12:20 PM #924    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

“All human evil comes from people’s inability to sit still in a room.”    Blaise Pascal


03/15/19 03:39 PM #925    

Stewart Myrent

Just saw this item, a reprint of a Huffington Post article, by David Moye, posted yesterday.  "Although the U.S. House voted unanimouly Thursday for a resolution asking that any final report in special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation be made public, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) has another priority.  Hillary Clinton's emails.  The House bill passed without a single no vote, but is a nonbinding resolution to make the Mueller report public, according to rhe 'Daily Beast'.  When the House's resolution reached the Senate, Graham blocked it (apparently one sole U.S. Senator can block Senate discussion of a bill sent to them by the House)[Parentheses mine], saying that there first needs to be a special counsel appointed to investigate 'the abuses, potentially, by the Department of Justice & the FBI regarding the Clinton email investigation.'  He then asked on the Senate floor, 'Was there two systems of justice in 2016?  One for the Democratic candidate and one for the Republican candidate?"  I have to ask Graham, or any other other non-defenders of our country & the U.S. Constitution, what does Hillary Clinton (or Bill, for that matter) have to do with ANY of this stuff?  What does Hillary have to do with Mueller's mandate, which is to determine if there was any collusion between Trump's campaign & the Russian government?  My first guess is that she has 0 to do with it, but that 0 involvement does not extend (seemingly) to Trump, or his campaign, or any of his associates.  Secondly, is Hillary the president, or is Trump?  Not only did she lose the election (not really), but she has been pretty much laying low & not getting too involved with politics.  (I expect that to change in the next year.)  So, do you think that Lindsey Graham is getting my vote for "Obstructionist of the Year"?  You bet.  I am beginning to find Republicans, who will do ANYTHING to curry favor with an erratic president, to be exceedingly irksome.  Is Lindsey Graham up for election in 2020?  (If so, I'm pretty sure that it's time for him to go - what an embarassment!) 


go to top 
  Post Message
  
    Prior Page
 Page  
Next Page      



UA-57122029-1