Message Forum


 
go to bottom 
  Post Message
  
    Prior Page
 Page  
Next Page      

02/06/19 04:42 PM #832    

 

Ronald I. Zager

Nancy, 

Thank you for recognizing Scott for his extensive contributions to supporting this site--well deserved!  And please, if I've overflooked anyone else be sure to "award" them for their special efforts.  Like Steve and "Jax" for expats-of-the-year?  Be creative! 

Ron


02/06/19 06:51 PM #833    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

Shooting survivors at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, traveled to Capitol Hill to press on for stricter gun laws and a ban of assault rifles.

In emotional testimony before a House panel on gun violence prevention, 17 year old Aalayah, a senior, described hiding under the body of a slain classmate last Valentine’s Day -

she said she and her peers have been “scarred emotionally for the rest of our lives.  Our stories and voices must be heard on the most important issue facing our generation.”  

Rep. Jerry Nadler, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee said, “We do not need another moment of silence, or more thoughts and prayers. 

"We need a moment of action. Today’s hearing is the first step toward that goal.”

There is bipartisan majority support in the House for Raise the Age Act to increase the minimum age from 18 to 21 to purchase an assault weapon.

The proposed House bill would fall far short of banning assault weapons as the Parkland students advocate

and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told a Bloomberg reporter in November that legislation restricting guns will not find Republican support in the Senate.

 


02/06/19 11:35 PM #834    

 

Marvin Irving Blusteln

Great SOU speech.  Even Nixon didn't threaten his own countrymen.


02/07/19 09:31 AM #835    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

Racism, sexual assault, and politics in Virginia

Zero-tolerance culture puts Democrats in a bind.

Is there a “hierarchy of offenses”?

Is it time to consider redemption and restorative justice in America?

 


02/07/19 03:58 PM #836    

 

Nancy Doyle (Sudlow)

Ron,
I would suggest you be awarded Peacemaker of the forum.
Nancy

02/07/19 05:05 PM #837    

 

Beverlee Ann Arpan (Marshall)

Ron,

I agree! You have my vote!

Bev

 


02/08/19 12:33 PM #838    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

The Mitch McConnell who tweeted:

“As I’ve said time and time again: Mindless obstruction is unacceptable.  The only way this divided Congress will be able to choose greatness and deliver significant legislation is by focusing on -- as President Trump put it -- ‘cooperation, compromise, and the common good.’ ”

is the same Mitch McConnell who said:

“One of my proudest moments was when I looked Barack Obama in the eye and said, ‘Mr. President, you will not fill the Supreme Court vacancy.’ ”

 


02/08/19 03:25 PM #839    

Stewart Myrent

​Just saw that PA Rep. Mike Kelly (R-PA), the top Republican on the House's Ways & Means Oversight Subcommittee, said,  if Democrats go after the president's tax returns, "Such an abuse of power would open a Pandora's Box.  It would be tough to get the lid back on, it would set a very dangerous precedent."  Are you kidding me, Mike Kelly?  What "dangerous prededent" would it set?  That presidents are obligated to release their Income Tax Returns?  This has been 'de rigeur' since Gerald Ford.  So, I have no idea what he's talking about, either relative to the Pandora's Box comment, or the "dangerous precedent" comment.  I am hoping that the voters in Mike Kelly's district, are not nearly as ignorant, as he, and are intelligent enough, to see through his obvious BS.  But, these are the people who elected this moron, in the first place.  I really can't take too much more of this bull----.  This is exactly why I wanted to totally skip 2019 & zip ahead right to 2020.  But, no, you couldn't let me just skip this one, lousy year.


02/08/19 03:58 PM #840    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

Imagine how perilous for the U.S. if the Democrats had not won the House of Representatives in 2018.  It’s frightening.  

We have always distinguished our constitutional form of government from others by saying we are a government of laws not men.  

The last two years with one party rule gives lie to our statement of constitutional government -- we seem less a government of law and more a government of corrupt people than we had reason to expect.  

 


02/08/19 10:36 PM #841    

Stewart Myrent

Just got home from work.  ​Janis, I agree whole-heartedly with your comments about the U.S. being a country of laws, not men, however, what stunned me, was that I had NOT considered where our country would be right now, if the Democrats had not won back the House of Representatives, if the Republicans still controlled both houses of Congress.  It's kind of scary to consider where we would be, if the Republicans still controlled the House.  (I am shocked, that the Republican Congress has been so pliable & agreeable to Trump - when Alan Alop wrote earlier this week that his Republican friends {if any} should jump off the Trump bandwagon as soon as possible, I totally agreed that now is the time.)  As sure as I am, that the Democrats have the legal ability to delve into all of Trump's illegitimate activities, including looking at his Federal Tax returns, I am, frankly, a little concerned that, knowing Trump, this whole mess could wind up being resolved by the U.S. Supreme Court.  And that court has been recently re-constituted with 2 members selected by Trump.  So, I'm not sure that the Supremes can be counted on to do the right thing (Ruth Bader Ginsburg - hang in there another couple of years, please!), but I have this sneaky suspicion that John Roberts, the Chief Justice, will make sure they do the right thing.  He has surprised me several times already & he may well be the deciding vote to make sure the Court does the right thing.


02/09/19 10:50 AM #842    

 

Marvin Irving Blusteln

Stewart you are an optimist.


02/09/19 01:54 PM #843    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

Can we agree that the electoral college system is not a fair system?  Is there a system that would effectively balance power between small and large population states?  

 California's                   Wyoming’s

Population is                Population is 

  39,776,830                     573,720 (and shrinking)

2019 population figures

 

California has               Wyoming has

  55                           3  

Electoral Votes•         Electoral Votes•

   

    723,215                      191,240

 Californians               Wyomingites

   =           =

1 Electoral Vote        1 Electoral Vote 

 

It is up to us to reestablish government of, by, for the People.

 


02/09/19 04:02 PM #844    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

 

“A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves.”  

 -- Edward R. Murrow.

 

Trump threatens those who question,

                                              fact check,

                               and exercise their voice.

 

“When the power of love

    overcomes

the love of power

the world will know peace.”  

 -- Jimi Hendrix

 

 


02/09/19 04:03 PM #845    

Stewart Myrent

​Janis, thank you for clearly displaying why the Electoral College is such a farce & why it gives the smaller states unequal (and outsized) representation in the Electoral College.  Back in November of last year, Paul tried to peddle this idea that, "...the Electoral College gives the states proportional representation...It was never about the direct election of a president."  So, I'm pretty sure the info you supplied, pretty much puts the lie to that idea.  Marv, I might not disagree that I am an optimist, in hoping that the Supreme Court will do the right thing, but can we, at least, say that I am a hopeful optimist?  Gotta go to work. 


02/10/19 02:32 PM #846    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

Only in America:

the guns used in mass shootings are a constitutional right but health care for the survivors is a privilege.

 


02/10/19 05:01 PM #847    

 

Paul Richard Hain

Janis and Stewart,

The Electoral College is made up of the same number of senators and representatives to which each state is entitled.  Janis, the formula you presented is not how it is calculated.  Each state gets one delegate for each senator and each representative the state has.  Washington DC gets 3 delegates per the 23rd Amendment.  Thus, the Electoral College representation of the States is equal to how they are represented in Congress with a total of 538 delegates.  The president is the president of the states.  The vote of the people is to determine whom the state delegates will vote for when the College convenes in Washington on the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December.  Stewart, I didn’t “peddle” anything to you.  These are facts.


02/10/19 06:31 PM #848    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

Yes, Paul, these are all facts established in laws created by white men now dead who wanted to preserve slavery and white (male) privilege.  “My calculation” does not dispute the facts - just demonstrates the disparity of the value of a vote for a (presidential elector) delegate voting for president in California and Wyoming.  

Are you comfortable having a president of the states (some of which are sparsely populated with shrinking populations) rather than a president of the people?

It wasn’t until June 1960 that Congress passed the 23rd amendment which was ratified in March 1961 and finally granted DC residents the right to vote for presidential electors in the electoral college.  

(To this day residents of DC are taxed without representation.)

 


02/10/19 11:21 PM #849    

Stewart Myrent

​Just got home from work & was going to hit the sack & wait 'till tomorrow to post, but I felt compelled to add my voice.  Paul, I believe that Janis clearly showed that 1 electoral vote in California represents 723,275 Californians, compared to 1 electoral vote in Wyoming representing 191,240 (Wyomingites?).  So, I feel that's a pretty good representation of the disparity inherent in the Electoral College.  But, Janis, my conclusion to the liberal/conservative conundrum was, "We see what we want to see."  So, Paul, Steve H. says I should make a point of seeing you at the 55th Reunion, as he felt, we would have a great time talking (should we exclude ANY political discussion - don't know?)  I hope to see you at our 55th.  I am actually hoping to see, at least, all of the people who follow this Forum, whether they be contributors, or not.  Can any of us count on making it to the 60th Reunion?  If you're thinking that you can count on making it to our 60th Reunion, 5 years hence, you've learned absolutely nothing in your life.  Please show up to the 55th, so I can explain it to you.


02/11/19 05:04 AM #850    

 

Paul Richard Hain

Stewart, Janis and everyone else (Steve and Alan, that includes you guys).  I plan to attend the 55th on September 19th and I hope to see many classmates that day.  I look forward to meeting you.  It is hard to believe that 5 years have passed since our last one.  Wow!

Why do we write?  Why do we come to the social get-togethers and reunions?  Speaking for myself, I love life and I think the Class of '64 has demonstrated we have put ourselves out to reconnect to a time of life that is important to us.  Many of us face serious health issues and many do not.  Writing on the Message Forum and meeting each other at a party celebrates life and lets us put aside our challenges and live, even if for just a brief while enjoying each other's company.  Bring pictures of your family and things you love to do.  Let's make September 19th a joyous occasion.

Ted and Ron, maybe we can update our mascot.  We will always be the Niles West Indians.  The Wolves doesn't do it, for me.  How about renaming our honored mascot the "North American Indigenous Peoples?"  Nah.  Forget it.  We'll always be the Indians.


02/11/19 05:21 AM #851    

 

Paul Richard Hain

Friday, February 8th was the seventh anniversary of my liver transplant.  I had Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis, and my only option was to find someone compatible to donate 2/3rd of their liver to replace mine.  My donor is a very special person. Her name is Kathy.  She and my daughter were grade and high school friends. Kathy responded to my daughter's Facebook story about my need for a donor.  After extensive testing, Kathy was found to be a perfect match.  A few weeks later, the surgeries took place.  This is a picture of Kathy and me at our first "transplantiversary."


02/11/19 07:53 AM #852    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

Paul, happy "transplantiversary" to you and to your donor Kathy.


02/11/19 11:42 AM #853    

Stewart Myrent

​Paul, I'm sure we all appreciated the update on your liver transplant, being that you have survived 7 yrs. now.  It's nice to get some good news, as the local/national/world news always sucks, on a daily basis.  Occasionally, you'll see a "feel-good" story, but not often.  But Paul, although I am your classmate, I am very much more amazed, and interested in, your donor, Kathy.  Whenever I hear stories like yours, I am amazed by the altruism of some people (like Kathy), because, to me, to be an organ donor is the epitome of altruism, as there is 0 in it, for the donor, except the possibility of facing complications, as a result of the surgery.  The recipient has everything to gain, with very little comparable risk (have the surgery, or die).  You look well (in your picture) & Kathy looks very well, also.  So, I'm guessing that the whole procedure went as well as possible & there were no majore problems w/the recuperation.  I always wonder, when I hear these stories, "Would I have done the same (as a donor), if it wasn't my daughter or brother, who neede a donor?"  I doubt it.  See you in September, if I am still with us.


02/11/19 12:38 PM #854    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

Stewart, I am inspired by your awareness and appreciation for the gift of life given by an organ donor.  Your honesty disarms me.  I too am "very much more amazed, and interested in Kathy... to be an organ donor is the epitome of altruism ... The recipient has everything to gain..."

I trust you are not foreshadowing your demise.  Take care.

 


02/11/19 07:05 PM #855    

Stewart Myrent

​Janis, you may trust that I am NOT foreshadowing my own demise.  The only reason I ended my last post with,"...if I'm still with us.", was to convey my belief in the indiscriminate & random fortunes of life.  However, I am feeling in tip-top shape & fully expect to see you all in September.  (But, of course, that's exactly when things don't go as planned.)  Thank you for your kind thoughts.


02/12/19 09:59 AM #856    

 

Paul Richard Hain

Hi Stewart and Janis,

Kathy is the main person in my story.  I'm glad you see what an amazing act it was on her part.  It was difficult enough for me to accept that I was on the cadaver transplant list waiting for someone to die so that I might live. I thought, "this shouldn't be.  Someone has to die for me to live.  I don't feel that worthy."  Finally, I accepted that the death of a donor was going to happen anyway.  If it was my turn, I reasoned it was acceptable to me.

Then, a transplant surgeon told me I would not get a cadaver liver because it is allocated by a strict liver chemistry formula (MELD) that is based on how most livers deteriorate from alcoholism and Hepatitis B and C.  My disease, Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC) killed my liver, but did not produce the liver enzymes to be measured by the MELD protocol.  No transplant hospital in the United States would make an exception for me.  He told me I was denied and that the only possiblilty was for us to find a living donor.  PSC affects 00.05% of the population.  I met with the doctor in charge of enforcing cadaver liver distribution across the entire Midwest. He confirmed I had no chance and that the committee that developed the standards knows a few diseases are not covered, but that they would not make any exceptions.  My choice was, a) find a living donor or b) take the death sentence.

Kathy is a very well educated young woman.  She was 33 years old when she read about my case on my daughter Heather's Facebook page.  Though they occasionally saw each other since graduating high school fifteen years earlier, they kept in touch via Facebook.  The girls were marching and concert band nerds playing all manner of percussion instruments.  They even recorded the drum line tattoo for Richard Dreyfuss' movie, "Mr. Holland's Opus" back in the 90's.  Dee and I loved having her musical friends around and we followed them everywhere they travelled for competition events. We casually knew her and her parents.  They were polite, caring and fun-loving people.

Kathy graduated with honors from UW Madison.  She worked for American Family Insurance headquarters in Madison for ten years.  She and her husband, Pete had been married for some time. They did not have any children, just their professions.  Pete worked as a Director for a philanthropic organization serving indigenous native Americans.  He was offered a promotion that required moving from Madison to Wausau, WI.  Kathy did not like to give up her job.  American Family told her they had a good-sized branch in Wausau and they would arrange a transfer for her.  All the pieces seemed to be coming together.

When they got to Wausau, American Family told her a mistake occurred and that there was no job for her.  You can imagine how crushed she was.  Her job was a big part of her life. She and Pete are people of faith, quietly keeping their disappointment to themselves.  Kathy wanted some answers for why this happened to her. .

Kathy was trying to discern what new possibilities there were when she saw Heather's Facebook page about my disease.  She called Heather and knew she was a blood type O+, just like me.  She wanted to know about the testing protocol at Northwestern Memorial Hospital in Chicago.  This was right after Thanksgiving 2011. She submitted to very extensive testing by hospital social worker, psychologist, and a full battery of MRI, heart, lungs, general health and surgeons that tried to talk her out of volunteering followed by a long wait for a decision.

Heather and my neighbor were blood type matches and had been tested, but were not an anatomical match (meaning the location of their bile duct, hepatic artery and portal vein did not match how mine were arranged.  Typically they have to test 5 people to find one that will match. When they cut the donor's piece off, there is no turning back.  They have to know to the greatest extent possible that the transplant will proceed.

I am going to tell you the rest just as she told me. Before being tested, she explained to Pete what she wanted to do.  They are both in the giving/caring for people business, which I think explains their commitment.  He said he would support her decision to go ahead.  Kathy got a call from the transplant center after Christmas confirming that she was a perfect match for me.  They asked her again to change her mind and that all they would tell me was that she was not a match.  She said, count me in and when can we do the surgery?  The hospiral said it would be 12-13 weeks because for a living donor surgery, they need two operating rooms,a primary transplant surgical team for her and one for me.  And, they needed a third team to take over if primary team members need a break.  Her surgery was 5 hours and mine was 13 1/2 hours.  Very demanding and tiring.

At the luncheon Kathy said the most difficult hurdle was telling her mother and father and brothers, being not sure how to tell it or what their reaction would be.  They listened to her thinking about the need she could supply and that the reason for her recent disappointments now became very clear.  They were fully behind her decision.  She never waivered.  She knew even before she was tested that she was going to be my donor.  Heather and I had exhaused all possible donors.  I had weeks or perhaps a few months to live, but now I was going to make that 12 weeks one way or another.  It was a very joyful, uplifting luncheon.  Kathy left for home.

I think faith and prayer are very powerful forces.  It may not be for everyone, but I accepted help from everyone in their own way.  Hundreds of people were praying for us. It made a huge difference in my life.

A few days after the luncheon, the transplant center called Kathy and said they had a cancellation and could do the surgeries in 10 days.  Both of us accepted this.  It was the solution for me!

On the day of surgery, Kathy and I were on gurneys in the hall outside the operating rooms.  Her medical team lead doctor came out and said; I'm going to repeat myself so Paul hears this time.  You are a perfecty healthy person.  We do not recommend surgery on you for that reason.  I recommend that you call this off right now and we all will go home for the day.  Kathy said she was there to donate part of her liver and let's get started.

My next memory was a groggy return to reality the next day after surgery.  "How was Kathy."  I needed to know she was all right.  Not too much later, Pete wheeled her into my room.  She had a smile on her face and so did I.  In that short time after surgery, my natural skin and eye color had returned.  I knew we both would recover.

She went home about a week after surgery.  The part of her liver she donated grew back in two months.  The liver is the only organ that regenerates itself.  I stayed at Mariott's Residence Inn for another three weeks because of daily visits to the transplant center.  Finally, I got released and went home.

Kathy and Pete had a baby girl three years ago and a baby boy last year about this time.  They are a happy family.  Their mother will have a great story to tell them about how she saved someone's life when they get older.  

The whole experience seemed to unfold according to a plan that wasn't visible at the time.  All of that took place and then life resumed to normal afterwards.  Our "transplantiversary" was February 8.  We decided to celebrate when the weather gets better and we can go to some family place where Heather and Kathy and Pete's children can enjoy themselves, too.

 


go to top 
  Post Message
  
    Prior Page
 Page  
Next Page      



UA-57122029-1
agape