Message Forum


 
go to bottom 
  Post Message
  
    Prior Page
 Page  
Next Page      

02/10/19 05:01 PM #847    

 

Paul Richard Hain

Janis and Stewart,

The Electoral College is made up of the same number of senators and representatives to which each state is entitled.  Janis, the formula you presented is not how it is calculated.  Each state gets one delegate for each senator and each representative the state has.  Washington DC gets 3 delegates per the 23rd Amendment.  Thus, the Electoral College representation of the States is equal to how they are represented in Congress with a total of 538 delegates.  The president is the president of the states.  The vote of the people is to determine whom the state delegates will vote for when the College convenes in Washington on the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December.  Stewart, I didn’t “peddle” anything to you.  These are facts.


02/10/19 06:31 PM #848    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

Yes, Paul, these are all facts established in laws created by white men now dead who wanted to preserve slavery and white (male) privilege.  “My calculation” does not dispute the facts - just demonstrates the disparity of the value of a vote for a (presidential elector) delegate voting for president in California and Wyoming.  

Are you comfortable having a president of the states (some of which are sparsely populated with shrinking populations) rather than a president of the people?

It wasn’t until June 1960 that Congress passed the 23rd amendment which was ratified in March 1961 and finally granted DC residents the right to vote for presidential electors in the electoral college.  

(To this day residents of DC are taxed without representation.)

 


02/10/19 11:21 PM #849    

Stewart Myrent

​Just got home from work & was going to hit the sack & wait 'till tomorrow to post, but I felt compelled to add my voice.  Paul, I believe that Janis clearly showed that 1 electoral vote in California represents 723,275 Californians, compared to 1 electoral vote in Wyoming representing 191,240 (Wyomingites?).  So, I feel that's a pretty good representation of the disparity inherent in the Electoral College.  But, Janis, my conclusion to the liberal/conservative conundrum was, "We see what we want to see."  So, Paul, Steve H. says I should make a point of seeing you at the 55th Reunion, as he felt, we would have a great time talking (should we exclude ANY political discussion - don't know?)  I hope to see you at our 55th.  I am actually hoping to see, at least, all of the people who follow this Forum, whether they be contributors, or not.  Can any of us count on making it to the 60th Reunion?  If you're thinking that you can count on making it to our 60th Reunion, 5 years hence, you've learned absolutely nothing in your life.  Please show up to the 55th, so I can explain it to you.


02/11/19 05:04 AM #850    

 

Paul Richard Hain

Stewart, Janis and everyone else (Steve and Alan, that includes you guys).  I plan to attend the 55th on September 19th and I hope to see many classmates that day.  I look forward to meeting you.  It is hard to believe that 5 years have passed since our last one.  Wow!

Why do we write?  Why do we come to the social get-togethers and reunions?  Speaking for myself, I love life and I think the Class of '64 has demonstrated we have put ourselves out to reconnect to a time of life that is important to us.  Many of us face serious health issues and many do not.  Writing on the Message Forum and meeting each other at a party celebrates life and lets us put aside our challenges and live, even if for just a brief while enjoying each other's company.  Bring pictures of your family and things you love to do.  Let's make September 19th a joyous occasion.

Ted and Ron, maybe we can update our mascot.  We will always be the Niles West Indians.  The Wolves doesn't do it, for me.  How about renaming our honored mascot the "North American Indigenous Peoples?"  Nah.  Forget it.  We'll always be the Indians.


02/11/19 05:21 AM #851    

 

Paul Richard Hain

Friday, February 8th was the seventh anniversary of my liver transplant.  I had Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis, and my only option was to find someone compatible to donate 2/3rd of their liver to replace mine.  My donor is a very special person. Her name is Kathy.  She and my daughter were grade and high school friends. Kathy responded to my daughter's Facebook story about my need for a donor.  After extensive testing, Kathy was found to be a perfect match.  A few weeks later, the surgeries took place.  This is a picture of Kathy and me at our first "transplantiversary."


02/11/19 07:53 AM #852    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

Paul, happy "transplantiversary" to you and to your donor Kathy.


02/11/19 11:42 AM #853    

Stewart Myrent

​Paul, I'm sure we all appreciated the update on your liver transplant, being that you have survived 7 yrs. now.  It's nice to get some good news, as the local/national/world news always sucks, on a daily basis.  Occasionally, you'll see a "feel-good" story, but not often.  But Paul, although I am your classmate, I am very much more amazed, and interested in, your donor, Kathy.  Whenever I hear stories like yours, I am amazed by the altruism of some people (like Kathy), because, to me, to be an organ donor is the epitome of altruism, as there is 0 in it, for the donor, except the possibility of facing complications, as a result of the surgery.  The recipient has everything to gain, with very little comparable risk (have the surgery, or die).  You look well (in your picture) & Kathy looks very well, also.  So, I'm guessing that the whole procedure went as well as possible & there were no majore problems w/the recuperation.  I always wonder, when I hear these stories, "Would I have done the same (as a donor), if it wasn't my daughter or brother, who neede a donor?"  I doubt it.  See you in September, if I am still with us.


02/11/19 12:38 PM #854    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

Stewart, I am inspired by your awareness and appreciation for the gift of life given by an organ donor.  Your honesty disarms me.  I too am "very much more amazed, and interested in Kathy... to be an organ donor is the epitome of altruism ... The recipient has everything to gain..."

I trust you are not foreshadowing your demise.  Take care.

 


02/11/19 07:05 PM #855    

Stewart Myrent

​Janis, you may trust that I am NOT foreshadowing my own demise.  The only reason I ended my last post with,"...if I'm still with us.", was to convey my belief in the indiscriminate & random fortunes of life.  However, I am feeling in tip-top shape & fully expect to see you all in September.  (But, of course, that's exactly when things don't go as planned.)  Thank you for your kind thoughts.


02/12/19 09:59 AM #856    

 

Paul Richard Hain

Hi Stewart and Janis,

Kathy is the main person in my story.  I'm glad you see what an amazing act it was on her part.  It was difficult enough for me to accept that I was on the cadaver transplant list waiting for someone to die so that I might live. I thought, "this shouldn't be.  Someone has to die for me to live.  I don't feel that worthy."  Finally, I accepted that the death of a donor was going to happen anyway.  If it was my turn, I reasoned it was acceptable to me.

Then, a transplant surgeon told me I would not get a cadaver liver because it is allocated by a strict liver chemistry formula (MELD) that is based on how most livers deteriorate from alcoholism and Hepatitis B and C.  My disease, Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC) killed my liver, but did not produce the liver enzymes to be measured by the MELD protocol.  No transplant hospital in the United States would make an exception for me.  He told me I was denied and that the only possiblilty was for us to find a living donor.  PSC affects 00.05% of the population.  I met with the doctor in charge of enforcing cadaver liver distribution across the entire Midwest. He confirmed I had no chance and that the committee that developed the standards knows a few diseases are not covered, but that they would not make any exceptions.  My choice was, a) find a living donor or b) take the death sentence.

Kathy is a very well educated young woman.  She was 33 years old when she read about my case on my daughter Heather's Facebook page.  Though they occasionally saw each other since graduating high school fifteen years earlier, they kept in touch via Facebook.  The girls were marching and concert band nerds playing all manner of percussion instruments.  They even recorded the drum line tattoo for Richard Dreyfuss' movie, "Mr. Holland's Opus" back in the 90's.  Dee and I loved having her musical friends around and we followed them everywhere they travelled for competition events. We casually knew her and her parents.  They were polite, caring and fun-loving people.

Kathy graduated with honors from UW Madison.  She worked for American Family Insurance headquarters in Madison for ten years.  She and her husband, Pete had been married for some time. They did not have any children, just their professions.  Pete worked as a Director for a philanthropic organization serving indigenous native Americans.  He was offered a promotion that required moving from Madison to Wausau, WI.  Kathy did not like to give up her job.  American Family told her they had a good-sized branch in Wausau and they would arrange a transfer for her.  All the pieces seemed to be coming together.

When they got to Wausau, American Family told her a mistake occurred and that there was no job for her.  You can imagine how crushed she was.  Her job was a big part of her life. She and Pete are people of faith, quietly keeping their disappointment to themselves.  Kathy wanted some answers for why this happened to her. .

Kathy was trying to discern what new possibilities there were when she saw Heather's Facebook page about my disease.  She called Heather and knew she was a blood type O+, just like me.  She wanted to know about the testing protocol at Northwestern Memorial Hospital in Chicago.  This was right after Thanksgiving 2011. She submitted to very extensive testing by hospital social worker, psychologist, and a full battery of MRI, heart, lungs, general health and surgeons that tried to talk her out of volunteering followed by a long wait for a decision.

Heather and my neighbor were blood type matches and had been tested, but were not an anatomical match (meaning the location of their bile duct, hepatic artery and portal vein did not match how mine were arranged.  Typically they have to test 5 people to find one that will match. When they cut the donor's piece off, there is no turning back.  They have to know to the greatest extent possible that the transplant will proceed.

I am going to tell you the rest just as she told me. Before being tested, she explained to Pete what she wanted to do.  They are both in the giving/caring for people business, which I think explains their commitment.  He said he would support her decision to go ahead.  Kathy got a call from the transplant center after Christmas confirming that she was a perfect match for me.  They asked her again to change her mind and that all they would tell me was that she was not a match.  She said, count me in and when can we do the surgery?  The hospiral said it would be 12-13 weeks because for a living donor surgery, they need two operating rooms,a primary transplant surgical team for her and one for me.  And, they needed a third team to take over if primary team members need a break.  Her surgery was 5 hours and mine was 13 1/2 hours.  Very demanding and tiring.

At the luncheon Kathy said the most difficult hurdle was telling her mother and father and brothers, being not sure how to tell it or what their reaction would be.  They listened to her thinking about the need she could supply and that the reason for her recent disappointments now became very clear.  They were fully behind her decision.  She never waivered.  She knew even before she was tested that she was going to be my donor.  Heather and I had exhaused all possible donors.  I had weeks or perhaps a few months to live, but now I was going to make that 12 weeks one way or another.  It was a very joyful, uplifting luncheon.  Kathy left for home.

I think faith and prayer are very powerful forces.  It may not be for everyone, but I accepted help from everyone in their own way.  Hundreds of people were praying for us. It made a huge difference in my life.

A few days after the luncheon, the transplant center called Kathy and said they had a cancellation and could do the surgeries in 10 days.  Both of us accepted this.  It was the solution for me!

On the day of surgery, Kathy and I were on gurneys in the hall outside the operating rooms.  Her medical team lead doctor came out and said; I'm going to repeat myself so Paul hears this time.  You are a perfecty healthy person.  We do not recommend surgery on you for that reason.  I recommend that you call this off right now and we all will go home for the day.  Kathy said she was there to donate part of her liver and let's get started.

My next memory was a groggy return to reality the next day after surgery.  "How was Kathy."  I needed to know she was all right.  Not too much later, Pete wheeled her into my room.  She had a smile on her face and so did I.  In that short time after surgery, my natural skin and eye color had returned.  I knew we both would recover.

She went home about a week after surgery.  The part of her liver she donated grew back in two months.  The liver is the only organ that regenerates itself.  I stayed at Mariott's Residence Inn for another three weeks because of daily visits to the transplant center.  Finally, I got released and went home.

Kathy and Pete had a baby girl three years ago and a baby boy last year about this time.  They are a happy family.  Their mother will have a great story to tell them about how she saved someone's life when they get older.  

The whole experience seemed to unfold according to a plan that wasn't visible at the time.  All of that took place and then life resumed to normal afterwards.  Our "transplantiversary" was February 8.  We decided to celebrate when the weather gets better and we can go to some family place where Heather and Kathy and Pete's children can enjoy themselves, too.

 


02/12/19 11:45 AM #857    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

One Year Later

As the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School nears its one-year mark, the city of Parkland, FL is recognizing February 14th as a Day of Service and Love, dedicated to those who were lost in an act of senseless violence.  

As part of the observation, Stoneman Douglas will have a non-academic school day ending at 11:40 AM.  Other Broward County Public Schools will have regular school schedules.  

At 2:21 PM, the City of Parkland will hold a moment of silence to honor the victims of the shooting.  At 10:17 AM, the entire school district and community will recognize a moment of silence.  

Community and volunteer events are planned into the weekend.  

 


02/12/19 03:34 PM #858    

Stewart Myrent

​Janis, thanks for the update on the Stoneman Douglas H.S. activities - I love those kids & the community seems to be rallying behind them.  But the thing I really want to address, is Paul's last post.  Paul, I want to thank you for your compelling & informative post.  You described everything about Kathy, that I was curious about, but her husband, Pete, is, also, a most interesting person, "...a Director for a philanthropic organization serving indigenous native Americans."  I was wondering if he had input into Kathy's decision (couldn't imagine that he wouldn't), but found later, that, he had.  But the story of them getting to Wausau & finding there was NO job for Kathy w/American Family, was heartbreaking.  Another thing that amazed me, was that, along the way, all the 'professionals', trying to talk her out of her decision to, in fact, be a donor.  I thought the part about meeting with her family members & the ensuing discussions with them & her feelings about all of that, were fascinating.  I thought at the beginning of the story, when you mentioned they had no children, that that was too bad.  Because, I felt, that they were 2 people who SHOULD have children, so I was very happy to hear that they now have 2 kids.  There are probably thousands of ways to be a good parent & probably a few dozen ways to be a bad parent.  Fortunately, most people are in the majority.  But, I'm guessing just about everybody has met a few people who should NOT be parents.  To me, Kathy & Pete represent the ideal of altruism.  I undetrstand how people of faith can look at your amazing story & have the faith that it was all according to God's plan  What else could explain it?  Everything was against you, Paul, the timing (primarily), the fact that you needed a living donor & everything else that made it, probably, a 1-2% chance that you would possibly survive.  Paul , I am sure you have thought this, but you are the luckiest man you know.  I have to say, though, that the older I get, the more I believe that I wiil take 'good luck' over just about anything else.  Good luck is always a winner, and much less painful.  Paul, thank again for the post.


02/13/19 08:47 AM #859    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

“Why do we write?”  

   We want to be heard.

Some hug the past,

  others live in the present...

                even look to the future.

Will we leave the world a better place than we found it?

 


02/13/19 09:56 PM #860    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

On the eve of the one-year mark of the Valentine's Massacre in Parkland, FL, the U.S. House Judiciary Committee advanced legislation that would require universal background checks for gun purchases.  Current law only requires licensed firearm dealers to conduct background checks before transferring a gun.  People seeking to transfer guns would have to visit a licensed firearms dealer to run a background check.  The legislation offers exemptions for gifts between family members as well as temporary transfers for use at a shooting range or hunting, or an exemption for temporary transfers that are "necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm."

Though bipartisan support for the legislation is weak, the bill has bipartisan sponsorship and is titled the “Bipartisan Background Checks Act.”  The Democrats hope to bring the measure to the House floor for a vote in the coming weeks.

In 1999 in the aftermath of the Columbine shooting the NRA endorsed requiring background checks for gun show sales - since then the NRA has reversed course and calls this legislation a "broadside against lawful firearm ownership in America."

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) has offered no sign that he would bring up the background checks expansion measure in the upper chamber.

The House Judiciary Committee also approved a bill that would close the so-called "Charleston loophole" which allows a gun sale to go forward if a background check isn't completed within three days by extending the review period to ten days, and allowing a purchaser to request a review if the background check isn't completed by then.

 


02/14/19 01:21 PM #861    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)


02/14/19 01:49 PM #862    

 

Nancy Doyle (Sudlow)

Thoughts and prayers are with the Parkland community and families who lost their sons and daughters in the horrible school massacre that took place one year ago today. Thank you to the young Parkland advocates who continue to fight every day for sensible gun legislation in our country

02/14/19 02:17 PM #863    

Stewart Myrent

​Janis, thank you for the roses on Valentine's Day (don't worry - I know it is a collective gift for all of us, not a personal gift to me).  Steve, I just got done watching a Night at the Garden (which occurred almost 80 years ago, to the day).  It was extremely chilling & disturbing, particularly, watching all those morons giving the Nazi salute.  I saw from the marquee, that it was sponsored by the Pro American committee, which as far as I could determine, was a front for the Nazi party in America.  Do I see similarities with what's going on in our country now?  You bet.  By the way, the speaker with the German accent - he seemed to believe that all the attendants knew exactly who he was, but I have no clue, as to his identity (do you have any idea who this guy WAS?).  Paul, I do have one more question for you.  As I mentioned in my previous post, I had no idea that the medical 'professionals', all along the way, during this process, were trying to dissuade Kathy from being an organ donor.  At any time during the process, did you ever think, "Enough with the trying to talk her out of it - she's already made up her mind to do the 'right thing', so, leave her alone about it.  AND my life depends on this."?  Just curious, because I could see myself thinking just that.


02/14/19 07:00 PM #864    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

Actually the roses are for the Grow Project Love Garden at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Florida.  Peaceful Parkland which was recognized as the safest city in Florida is now Purposeful Parkland.  I am totally inspired by the MSD Strong Community and all they are doing to support healing in their schools and greater Parkland area.  At the interfaith memorial ceremonies it was the Baptist preacher who recognized he was in a public park and spoke in support of the young Parkland advocates and common gun sense legislation... he's made up his mind to do the "right thing."  Some of the students shared the depth of their pain in poetry they have written.  It was an amazing experience to be anonymous in a sea of students who seem so familiar to me.

 


02/15/19 06:37 AM #865    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

For you who might be interested -

Amy Klobuchar, Bernie Sanders, Sherrod Brown, Michael Bennet, and Jeff Merkley voted for the budget bill yesterday.

Cory Booker, Kamala Harris, Kirsten Gillibrand, Elizabeth Warren (and Ed Markey) voted against the budget bill.

Republican presidential hopefuls also voted against the budget bill.

Donald Trump is expected to sign the bill, declare a national emergency to redirect funds to build the wall, and then fly to Mar-a-Lago.  The national emergency is a fiction created by Trump to justify funding a wall that is necessary only to satisfy his voters.

 


02/15/19 10:36 AM #866    

Stewart Myrent

​Steve, thank you for your quick response about who's that Nazi.  Fritz Kuhn - the name is not familiar to me - although as "the American Hitler", you would think I would have heard of this guy.  But I'm sure I heard a German accent coming out of his sick mouth, so my guess is that he was NOT a native-born American.  Also, I did notice that huge portrait of George Washington & thought, "What would he have thought about this gathering?"  Also, Paul, not so quick response to my question about what you were thinking, the whole time the 'professionals' were trying to dissuade Kathy from being your much-needed donor.  I'm sorry, but I am very curious about what you were thinking, at the time.  Also, Janis, I am a little disappointed to find out that your Valentine's Day roses, were not a gift for all of us, but were related to the Parkland kids.


02/15/19 01:12 PM #867    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

 

Trump Is the GOP’s National Emergency

THE NEW YORKER

 

The New Republican Strategy for Dealing with the Emergency That Is Trump: Pray

By Susan B. Glasser

February 14, 2019

President Trump has already begun the process of memorializing his epic defeat as a victory  FINISH THE WALL  and has dragged congressional Republicans into a whole new fight.

 

At around 11 A.M. on Wednesday, a weary-looking Senator Mitch McConnell came to the Senate floor. “It’s time to get this done,” the Majority Leader said. McConnell, of course, was talking about the deal that his negotiators had reached with Democrats to pass a bill that would keep the U.S. government from shutting down once again—over President Trump’s demand for money to fund his proposed border wall. As always, there remained one big problem: whether Trump himself would go along with it. Soon after the deal was announced, John Cornyn, a Republican senator from Texas, flew back with the President to Washington from El Paso, on Air Force One, on Tuesday. He and others urged Trump to accept it and move on, but Cornyn was nowhere near sure that it would happen. “My hope is he recognizes this is an incremental win,” the senator told Politico. “We’ll hold our breath.”

No one these days, not even the loyal Republican guard on Capitol Hill, can predict what Trump, increasingly cornered by the results of a midterm election that handed Democrats control of the House of Representatives, will do or say. There is no Team Trump from the President’s point of view, only a leader and his followers, yet the entire Trump Presidency is an extended reminder of the fact that it’s awfully hard to follow if you don’t know where the leader wants you to go. “I would have preferred we not had the shutdown,” Steve Scalise, the Republican Whip in the House, said Thursday morning, without knowing if there might be another. When CNN caught up with his G.O.P. colleague Richard Shelby, the chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee, who cut the deal, Shelby was unsure of what Trump would do, as well. “I pray” that he will sign the spending bill, Shelby said. At around that same time, the Republican Chuck Grassley was on the Senate floor, asking the entire chamber to join in seeking divine intervention with Trump. “Let’s all pray that the President will have the wisdom to sign the bill, so that the government doesn’t shut down,” he said, as Washington waited, once again, on its capricious President.

So it’s finally come to this: only God can stop Trump, as members of his own party are admitting that they’ve basically given up trying. Sure enough, a few hours after Grassley spoke, McConnell returned to the Senate floor and announced that the President would sign the bill but also declare a national emergency in order to fund the wall. The whole episode served only to underscore the plight of congressional Republicans under Trump: holding their breath and praying that Trump doesn’t humiliate them even more than he already has with the shutdown drama; praying that something worse doesn’t happen, such as a Mueller report that forces them to publicly choose between their President and their country; praying that the Democrats will somehow overplay their hand so badly that it changes the subject in next year’s elections from Trump and all his divisiveness. “That soft, shuffling sound you hear is congressional Republicans stepping away from President Trump,” the political commentator John Harwood wrote, in his CNBC column on Tuesday. In the Wall Street Journal on Wednesday, the lead editorial begged Trump to declare “border victory” and go home. “The bipartisan deal is his only good way out of this budget box canyon,” the paper said. Underscoring the point, the editors ran an op-ed on the page across from the editorial headlined “Trump’s wall crumbles under the law of diminishing returns.” The piece argued that Trump is in such trouble now because he “promised to be a dealmaker, not a conviction politician,” and he just doesn’t have deals to brag about.

Watching Republicans publicly lobby their guy to give in this week was an extraordinary tutorial in their challenge of trying to manage an unmanageable President. They had to convince Trump that a loss was a win, albeit, as Cornyn put it, a highly “incremental” one. Even for Trump, this was a dubious argument. Still, Trump has one political skill that is useful to his allies in a situation like this: the desire, and ability, to create an alternate reality when the actual reality does not suffice. The facts here are terrible for the President, as they have been since late December, when Trump reneged on the previous deal reached by congressional negotiators and, essentially, unilaterally shut down a large part of the federal government. Thirty-five days later, that shutdown ended ignominiously for the President, when too many members of his own party had had enough. The two-week delay that Trump bought himself at the time also has now ended without a victory. Instead, the compromise agreed to on the Hill allows for $1.375 billion in border-security funding—far less than what was on offer in a deal Trump rejected last year. And, in another loss, those funds can only be used to construct fifty-five miles of new border barriers of the type the government has been building since well before Trump became President. In other words: no wall.

For any other politician, this would be a humiliating loss, which is the reason why Republicans on Capitol Hill were so uncertain, right up until the last minute, whether the President would sign it. Trump, however, has already begun the process of memorializing his epic defeat as a victory, and will claim that his emergency declaration is more than sufficient grounds to move money around from elsewhere in the federal budget to accomplish his border plans. Even if the courts shoot him down on that one, it still probably won’t matter to the President, who is likely to brag that he has won, anyway. On Monday, in fact, he held a campaign rally in El Paso underneath a banner that urged, “Finish the Wall!” Never mind that the wall is not even begun, and likely never will be; never mind that Mexico, despite the President’s oft-repeated promise, is not going to pay for it; never mind the details of the congressional compromise. Trump’s self-protective alternate-reality machine found a way around the facts. “The wall is very, very on its way,” he said on Wednesday. “We are building as we speak.” He added that the nonexistent wall, which is not being finished or even built, would, in fact, be harder than Mount Everest to climb, which instantly became one of those Trump-era tweets that you’re not sure is a joke or something the President of the United States actually said.

Given that this came only a couple of hours after the Washington Post reported that Trump recently installed a “room-sized ‘golf simulator’ ” in the White House, at a cost of roughly fifty thousand dollars, so that he can play a full eighteen holes without leaving the property, it seemed like a moment to remember how tenuous the line between parody and political reality has become in Trump’s Washington. At the very least, it helps explain why the President has so infrequently left the White House this winter.

Meanwhile, not everyone has been taking a vacation from reality, and the nature of the Democratic threat to Trump from the newly empowered House leaders is becoming clearer. This week, two House committees, Intelligence and Judiciary, signalled an aggressive approach to investigating Trump—without waiting for the report of the special counsel, Robert Mueller. House Democrats “plan a vast probe of Trump and Russia—with a heavy focus on money-laundering,” as Mike Allen declared in his Axios morning newsletter, reporting from a briefing, which we both attended, with a House Democrat. Trump “is not in a position to draw red lines” and block Democrats from looking into his finances, the member told a roomful of reporters. The House Democrats’ investigation could include the financial dealings of Trump and his family not only with Russian interests but also with Saudis and other Gulf states. On the House Judiciary Committee, the new chairman this week hired two well-known Democratic lawyers who have publicly led the calls for an obstruction-of-justice investigation of Trump, which could lead to his impeachment.

A new conventional wisdom seems to have formed in recent weeks that the Mueller investigation is all but over, that it won’t be the knockout blow to the President many Democrats had anticipated, or that it may become the subject of an enormous fight with the Trump Justice Department over even transmitting its conclusions to Congress. Impeachment, while supported by the Party’s base, is unlikely to happen—or so this line of reasoning has it. But this week’s developments suggest that another course is possible: emboldened Democrats are neither waiting for Mueller nor limited to whatever it is that Mueller finds. The investigations of Trump are happening, and for now, at least, they are more real than his wall.

 


02/15/19 02:20 PM #868    

Stewart Myrent

​Janis, thank you for the op-ed from the Wall Street Journal - I thought it was very cogently written & well-thought out.  Maybe there's hope for this country - perhaps the country can go back to the days when America was last great.  I'm thinking as far back as 2015, but I'm not sure.  Or is it too late for that?  Steve, although in my last post, I congratulated you on your quick response to my Nazi question & mildly criticized Paul, for not answering a question of mine, I'm sorry, but I have to bring this up.  If you will recall, a few days ago, I asked the first of several times, for an explanation of the picture of you & (I presume your grandkids, or kids [?]), with the moustaches.  I have to say, that, considering your obvious reluctance to address this matter, I am growing even more suspicious about the authenticity of those moustaches.  I'm sure you were hoping that I would forget all about this, but you can disavow yourself of that notion.  I am still curious about your response & I am still waiting for an answer. 


02/15/19 08:11 PM #869    

 

Paul Richard Hain

Stewart,

Kathy’s husband Pete is a man to be admired.  They each had their professions.  When she lost her job, he was there for her providing moral support and love.  She told Pete about her desire to be a donor. Though he may not have known it, at that moment, he shouldered new responsibility. He would be with her through the testing phase and then by her side when she explained her desire to be a donor to the rest of her family.

 The weight on his shoulders was just beginning.  Liver donor surgeries done in the United States had been 100% successful until 6 months before our surgeries.  A liver donor in Colorado suddenly died in recovery. The loss was terrible.  They could not find a reason for the death.  All transplant hospitals reviewed every detail of their surgery procedures. All living donor operations were halted for a time awaiting some finding that would explain what happened.  That never happened.  Finally, the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) and Health and Human Services (HHS) changed the age eligibility from 18-60 years to 21-55, thus limiting the potential number of donors.  Living donor surgeries restarted very cautiously.  Pete and Kathy were fully aware of this, raising the concerns for her own health and recovery.  Pete was going to be her caregiver helping with her every need.  It should be a few weeks.  Now, it could be permanent or worse, death.  That was my greatest fear.  What if she got harmed? Or, worse, death?  Those thoughts stayed with me until I knew she was fine after surgery.

Kathy and I had separate medical teams.  It is medically ethical to do it that way.  So, her team leader, Dr. Baker chose to recommend for one last time that Kathy should not go through with the surgery.  My reaction was that I understood what was happening.  My doctors had told me her doctors would try to discourage her.  It was a moment of life or death for me.  I knew what was at stake.  I also had many months previously to learn how to accept my fate.  I was pretty sure Kathy would not change her mind.  Our pre-transplant dinner four days earlier was ample time and discussion to know how resolute she, Pete and her Mom and Dad were to see this through to conclusion.

Kathy and Pete's confidence never waivered. They were united. Their optimism and good humor actually helped us all look forward to the surgeries with confidence.  As far as I can tell, there is only one glaring area of disagreement in their marriage: Pete is a Green Bay Packers fan and Kathy is for, ‘Da Bears. But, they both agree that the University of Wisconsin Badgers are the best college football team.

Kathy and Pete moved into a larger home for their growing family. With grandparents nearby to babysit, Kathy is now doing some part-time HR work.  Pete moved to a new position as the Director of Development for the UW School of Medicine.  

Each of us draws our own conclusions about how all these events came to pass.  From childhood friendships, two women desiring to help me survive fifteen years later, to the remarkable events in Pete and Kathy’s lives that resulted in such an incredible story.  We are made to wonder about this.  Reach your own conclusions.  You are probably right!  Wouldn’t it be great if more stories like this happened more often?


02/15/19 11:48 PM #870    

Stewart Myrent

​Paul, thank you so much for your most recent response to my queries.  I have to say that with each additional detail that you have added to your story, it grows increasingly amazing to me that you wound up with as perfect an ending, as was possible.  The fact that your doctors were telling you that her doctors were telling her not to do it, had to be totally disheartening.  I was relatively surprised to hear that, prior to 6 mos. before your surgery, the liver transplants from live donors was 100% successful in the U.S.  I didn't think anything was 100% successful.  I am, of course, totally blown away by your background story of Kathy & Pete.  I don't have to tell you what exceptional people they are.  It sounds like, because of Pete's job, they have moved back to Madison.  One last question: who are the two people whose photo has replaced the white Standard poodle?  Steve, relative to the moustache question: you have learned well from your conservative teachers, grasshopper - if the answer is uncomfortable, do not answer the question directly, but deflect & put the onus on the questioner.  I promise I will stop asking about the moustaches.  This is the 3rd time I've posted today - never done that before - I think there's something wrong with me.


02/16/19 09:11 AM #871    

 

Janis Kliphardt (Emery)

Random acts of kindness are fundamental to becoming who we can be - they encourage us to move beyond the transactional nature of our world and to develop the kinder side of our nature.  We won't live long enough for random acts of kindness to bring health to our country and gun safety to our communities. 

 


go to top 
  Post Message
  
    Prior Page
 Page  
Next Page      



UA-57122029-1